Analysing SCF convergence

The goal of this example is to explain the differing convergence behaviour of SCF algorithms depending on the choice of the mixing. For this we look at the eigenpairs of the Jacobian governing the SCF convergence, that is

\[1 - α P^{-1} \varepsilon^\dagger \qquad \text{with} \qquad \varepsilon^\dagger = (1-\chi_0 K).\]

where $α$ is the damping $P^{-1}$ is the mixing preconditioner (e.g. KerkerMixing, LdosMixing) and $\varepsilon^\dagger$ is the dielectric operator.

We thus investigate the largest and smallest eigenvalues of $(P^{-1} \varepsilon^\dagger)$ and $\varepsilon^\dagger$. The ratio of largest to smallest eigenvalue of this operator is the condition number

\[\kappa = \frac{\lambda_\text{max}}{\lambda_\text{min}},\]

which can be related to the rate of convergence of the SCF. The smaller the condition number, the faster the convergence. For more details on SCF methods, see Self-consistent field methods.

For our investigation we consider a crude aluminium setup:

using AtomsBuilder
using DFTK

system_Al = bulk(:Al; cubic=true) * (4, 1, 1)
FlexibleSystem(Al₁₆, periodicity = TTT):
    cell_vectors      : [    16.2        0        0;
                                0     4.05        0;
                                0        0     4.05]u"Å"

and we discretise:

using PseudoPotentialData

pseudopotentials = PseudoFamily("dojo.nc.sr.lda.v0_4_1.standard.upf")
model_Al = model_DFT(system_Al; functionals=LDA(), temperature=1e-3,
                     symmetries=false, pseudopotentials)
basis_Al = PlaneWaveBasis(model_Al; Ecut=7, kgrid=[1, 1, 1]);

On aluminium (a metal) already for moderate system sizes (like the 8 layers we consider here) the convergence without mixing / preconditioner is slow:

# Note: DFTK uses the self-adapting LdosMixing() by default, so to truly disable
#       any preconditioning, we need to supply `mixing=SimpleMixing()` explicitly.
scfres_Al = self_consistent_field(basis_Al; tol=1e-12, mixing=SimpleMixing());
n     Energy            log10(ΔE)   log10(Δρ)   Diag   Δtime 
---   ---------------   ---------   ---------   ----   ------
  1   -36.73326805754                   -0.88   11.0    1.36s
  2   -36.72873784727   +   -2.34       -1.63    1.0    373ms
  3   -21.94122041041   +    1.17       -0.47    7.0    179ms
  4   -36.04800101493        1.15       -1.07    5.0    167ms
  5   -36.37279285292       -0.49       -1.26    4.0    152ms
  6   -36.38876548263       -1.80       -1.27    3.0    129ms
  7   -36.72861401349       -0.47       -1.78    3.0    128ms
  8   -36.73657653818       -2.10       -1.90    2.0    105ms
  9   -36.74220999211       -2.25       -2.53    1.0   91.6ms
 10   -36.74199623433   +   -3.67       -2.35    3.0    130ms
 11   -36.74227498365       -3.55       -2.44    2.0    103ms
 12   -36.74240363654       -3.89       -2.82    1.0   88.7ms
 13   -36.74245483587       -4.29       -3.03    2.0    112ms
 14   -36.74247946504       -4.61       -3.44    2.0    110ms
 15   -36.74237422158   +   -3.98       -3.01    3.0    135ms
 16   -36.74247644453       -3.99       -3.66    3.0    127ms
 17   -36.74243657207   +   -4.40       -3.21    3.0    131ms
 18   -36.74232172036   +   -3.94       -2.96    3.0    136ms
 19   -36.74247864199       -3.80       -3.74    3.0    238ms
 20   -36.74248021680       -5.80       -3.99    1.0   88.7ms
 21   -36.74248054057       -6.49       -4.14    2.0    1.24s
 22   -36.74248051292   +   -7.56       -4.35    2.0   97.9ms
 23   -36.74248062831       -6.94       -4.65    2.0    120ms
 24   -36.74248067012       -7.38       -4.88    2.0    103ms
 25   -36.74248067204       -8.72       -5.35    1.0   88.4ms
 26   -36.74248067145   +   -9.23       -5.46    3.0    129ms
 27   -36.74248067025   +   -8.92       -5.32    3.0    127ms
 28   -36.74248067187       -8.79       -5.57    3.0    121ms
 29   -36.74248067197      -10.02       -5.57    2.0    113ms
 30   -36.74248067243       -9.34       -5.81    3.0    118ms
 31   -36.74248067259       -9.81       -6.04    1.0    104ms
 32   -36.74248067267      -10.10       -6.22    2.0    142ms
 33   -36.74248067268      -10.90       -6.62    2.0    117ms
 34   -36.74248067268      -11.51       -6.78    2.0    123ms
 35   -36.74248067268   +  -11.30       -6.62    3.0    141ms
 36   -36.74248067268      -11.54       -6.80    2.0    104ms
 37   -36.74248067268      -11.60       -7.05    2.0    113ms
 38   -36.74248067268      -12.29       -7.47    2.0   98.1ms
 39   -36.74248067268   +  -12.14       -7.04    3.0    135ms
 40   -36.74248067268      -12.14       -7.53    3.0    128ms
 41   -36.74248067268   +  -13.30       -7.58    2.0    111ms
 42   -36.74248067268      -13.15       -7.92    2.0   97.8ms
 43   -36.74248067268   +  -13.15       -7.53    3.0    128ms
 44   -36.74248067268   +  -13.15       -7.42    3.0    137ms
 45   -36.74248067268      -12.85       -8.30    3.0    131ms
 46   -36.74248067268      -13.67       -8.34    2.0    121ms
 47   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15       -8.59    2.0    105ms
 48   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15       -8.90    2.0    103ms
 49   -36.74248067268   +  -13.85       -9.08    2.0    126ms
 50   -36.74248067268      -13.55       -9.25    2.0    103ms
 51   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15       -9.32    2.0    112ms
 52   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15       -9.42    3.0    123ms
 53   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf       -9.52    3.0    112ms
 54   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -10.05    1.0   93.1ms
 55   -36.74248067268      -13.85       -9.47    4.0    143ms
 56   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf       -9.96    3.0    153ms
 57   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -10.20    2.0    103ms
 58   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -10.68    2.0    108ms
 59   -36.74248067268      -13.85      -10.42    3.0    135ms
 60   -36.74248067268   +  -13.85      -10.91    2.0    122ms
 61   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -11.15    2.0   98.4ms
 62   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -10.88    2.0    126ms
 63   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -11.03    2.0    109ms
 64   -36.74248067268      -14.15      -11.46    2.0    108ms
 65   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -11.57    3.0    122ms
 66   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -11.91    2.0    108ms
 67   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -11.60    3.0    135ms
 68   -36.74248067268      -13.85      -12.08    3.0    126ms

while when using the Kerker preconditioner it is much faster:

scfres_Al = self_consistent_field(basis_Al; tol=1e-12, mixing=KerkerMixing());
n     Energy            log10(ΔE)   log10(Δρ)   Diag   Δtime 
---   ---------------   ---------   ---------   ----   ------
  1   -36.73261686493                   -0.88   10.0    1.02s
  2   -36.73967956398       -2.15       -1.36    1.0    1.07s
  3   -36.74047257475       -3.10       -1.64    2.0    119ms
  4   -36.74231967226       -2.73       -2.29    1.0    110ms
  5   -36.74228904701   +   -4.51       -2.67    7.0    133ms
  6   -36.74238227807       -4.03       -2.53    2.0    119ms
  7   -36.74244942963       -4.17       -2.99    1.0   88.4ms
  8   -36.74246720027       -4.75       -3.19    2.0    108ms
  9   -36.74247984490       -4.90       -3.48    2.0    122ms
 10   -36.74248016310       -6.50       -3.79    1.0   94.6ms
 11   -36.74248065943       -6.30       -4.41    1.0   90.6ms
 12   -36.74248066716       -8.11       -4.69    5.0    140ms
 13   -36.74248067157       -8.36       -4.93    2.0    123ms
 14   -36.74248067175       -9.76       -5.39    2.0    102ms
 15   -36.74248067266       -9.04       -5.90    5.0    114ms
 16   -36.74248067267      -11.31       -5.85    3.0    142ms
 17   -36.74248067268      -11.07       -6.32    1.0   95.8ms
 18   -36.74248067268      -11.48       -6.62    3.0    121ms
 19   -36.74248067268      -12.14       -6.98    2.0    128ms
 20   -36.74248067268      -12.66       -7.43    2.0   96.8ms
 21   -36.74248067268      -14.15       -7.49    2.0    129ms
 22   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15       -7.86    1.0   91.3ms
 23   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf       -8.35    3.0    127ms
 24   -36.74248067268      -14.15       -8.62    5.0    113ms
 25   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf       -9.02    2.0    128ms
 26   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf       -9.33    2.0    110ms
 27   -36.74248067268      -13.85       -9.81    2.0   97.0ms
 28   -36.74248067268   +  -13.85       -9.68    3.0    137ms
 29   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -10.07    2.0   96.7ms
 30   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -10.27    2.0    121ms
 31   -36.74248067268      -13.85      -10.87    1.0   91.3ms
 32   -36.74248067268      -14.15      -11.02    3.0    143ms
 33   -36.74248067268   +  -14.15      -11.31    2.0   96.8ms
 34   -36.74248067268      -14.15      -11.71    2.0    128ms
 35   -36.74248067268   +    -Inf      -12.20    2.0    102ms

Given this scfres_Al we construct functions representing $\varepsilon^\dagger$ and $P^{-1}$:

# Function, which applies P^{-1} for the case of KerkerMixing
Pinv_Kerker(δρ) = DFTK.mix_density(KerkerMixing(), basis_Al, δρ)

# Function which applies ε† = 1 - χ0 K
function epsilon(δρ)
    δV   = apply_kernel(basis_Al, δρ; ρ=scfres_Al.ρ)
    χ0δV = apply_χ0(scfres_Al, δV).δρ
    δρ - χ0δV
end
epsilon (generic function with 1 method)

With these functions available we can now compute the desired eigenvalues. For simplicity we only consider the first few largest ones.

using KrylovKit
λ_Simple, X_Simple = eigsolve(epsilon, randn(size(scfres_Al.ρ)), 3, :LM;
                              tol=1e-3, eager=true, verbosity=2)
λ_Simple_max = maximum(real.(λ_Simple))
44.024488980656656

The smallest eigenvalue is a bit more tricky to obtain, so we will just assume

λ_Simple_min = 0.952
0.952

This makes the condition number around 30:

cond_Simple = λ_Simple_max / λ_Simple_min
46.24421111413515

This does not sound large compared to the condition numbers you might know from linear systems.

However, this is sufficient to cause a notable slowdown, which would be even more pronounced if we did not use Anderson, since we also would need to drastically reduce the damping (try it!).

Having computed the eigenvalues of the dielectric matrix we can now also look at the eigenmodes, which are responsible for the bad convergence behaviour. The largest eigenmode for example:

using Statistics
using Plots
mode_xy = mean(real.(X_Simple[1]), dims=3)[:, :, 1, 1]  # Average along z axis
heatmap(mode_xy', c=:RdBu_11, aspect_ratio=1, grid=false,
        legend=false, clim=(-0.006, 0.006))

This mode can be physically interpreted as the reason why this SCF converges slowly. For example in this case it displays a displacement of electron density from the centre to the extremal parts of the unit cell. This phenomenon is called charge-sloshing.

We repeat the exercise for the Kerker-preconditioned dielectric operator:

λ_Kerker, X_Kerker = eigsolve(Pinv_Kerker ∘ epsilon,
                              randn(size(scfres_Al.ρ)), 3, :LM;
                              tol=1e-3, eager=true, verbosity=2)

mode_xy = mean(real.(X_Kerker[1]), dims=3)[:, :, 1, 1]  # Average along z axis
heatmap(mode_xy', c=:RdBu_11, aspect_ratio=1, grid=false,
        legend=false, clim=(-0.006, 0.006))

Clearly the charge-sloshing mode is no longer dominating.

The largest eigenvalue is now

maximum(real.(λ_Kerker))
4.723540830580944

Since the smallest eigenvalue in this case remains of similar size (it is now around 0.8), this implies that the conditioning improves noticeably when KerkerMixing is used.

Note: Since LdosMixing requires solving a linear system at each application of $P^{-1}$, determining the eigenvalues of $P^{-1} \varepsilon^\dagger$ is slightly more expensive and thus not shown. The results are similar to KerkerMixing, however.

We could repeat the exercise for an insulating system (e.g. a Helium chain). In this case you would notice that the condition number without mixing is actually smaller than the condition number with Kerker mixing. In other words employing Kerker mixing makes the convergence worse. A closer investigation of the eigenvalues shows that Kerker mixing reduces the smallest eigenvalue of the dielectric operator this time, while keeping the largest value unchanged. Overall the conditioning thus workens.

Takeaways:

  • For metals the conditioning of the dielectric matrix increases steeply with system size.
  • The Kerker preconditioner tames this and makes SCFs on large metallic systems feasible by keeping the condition number of order 1.
  • For insulating systems the best approach is to not use any mixing.
  • The ideal mixing strongly depends on the dielectric properties of system which is studied (metal versus insulator versus semiconductor).