# Polarizability by linear response

We compute the polarizability of a Helium atom. The polarizability is defined as the change in dipole moment

$$$\mu = \int r ρ(r) dr$$$

with respect to a small uniform electric field $E = -x$.

We compute this in two ways: first by finite differences (applying a finite electric field), then by linear response. Note that DFTK is not really adapted to isolated atoms because it uses periodic boundary conditions. Nevertheless we can simply embed the Helium atom in a large enough box (although this is computationally wasteful).

As in other tests, this is not fully converged, convergence parameters were simply selected for fast execution on CI,

using DFTK
using LinearAlgebra

a = 10.
lattice = a * I(3)  # cube of a bohrs
atoms = [He => [[1/2; 1/2; 1/2]]]  # Helium at the center of the box

kgrid = [1, 1, 1]  # no kpoint sampling for an isolated system
Ecut = 30
tol = 1e-8

# dipole moment of a given density (assuming the current geometry)
function dipole(basis, ρ)
rr = [a * (r - 1/2) for r in r_vectors(basis)]
d = sum(rr .* ρ) * basis.dvol
end;

## Polarizability by finite differences

We first compute the polarizability by finite differences. First compute the dipole moment at rest:

model = model_LDA(lattice, atoms; symmetries=false)
basis = PlaneWaveBasis(model; Ecut, kgrid)
res = self_consistent_field(basis, tol=tol)
μref = dipole(basis, res.ρ)
-0.0001358030060009803

Then in a small uniform field:

ε = .01
model_ε = model_LDA(lattice, atoms; extra_terms=[ExternalFromReal(r -> -ε * (r - a/2))],
symmetries=false)
basis_ε = PlaneWaveBasis(model_ε; Ecut, kgrid)
res_ε = self_consistent_field(basis_ε, tol=tol)
με = dipole(basis_ε, res_ε.ρ)
0.01761797239951
polarizability = (με - μref) / ε

println("Reference dipole:  $μref") println("Displaced dipole:$με")
println("Polarizability :   $polarizability") Reference dipole: -0.0001358030060009803 Displaced dipole: 0.01761797239951 Polarizability : 1.775377540551098 The result on more converged grids is very close to published results. For example DOI 10.1039/C8CP03569E quotes 1.65 with LSDA and 1.38 with CCSD(T). ## Polarizability by linear response Now we use linear response to compute this analytically; we refer to standard textbooks for the formalism. In the following,$\chi_0$is the independent-particle polarizability, and$K$the Hartree-exchange-correlation kernel. We denote with$\delta V_{\rm ext}$an external perturbing potential (like in this case the uniform electric field). Then: $$$\delta\rho = \chi_0 \delta V = \chi_0 (\delta V_{\rm ext} + K \delta\rho),$$$ which implies $$$\delta\rho = (1-\chi_0 K)^-1 \chi_0 \delta V_{\rm ext}.$$$ From this we identify the polarizability operator to be$\chi = (1-\chi_0 K)^{-1} \chi_0$. Numerically, we apply$\chi$to$\delta V = -x$by solving a linear equation (the Dyson equation) iteratively. using KrylovKit # Apply (1- χ0 K) function dielectric_operator(δρ) δV = apply_kernel(basis, δρ; ρ=res.ρ) χ0δV = apply_χ0(res.ham, res.ψ, res.εF, res.eigenvalues, δV) δρ - χ0δV end # δVext is the potential from a uniform field interacting with the dielectric dipole # of the density. δVext = [-a * (r - 1/2) for r in r_vectors(basis)] δVext = cat(δVext; dims=4) # Apply χ0 once to get non-interacting dipole δρ_nointeract = apply_χ0(res.ham, res.ψ, res.εF, res.eigenvalues, δVext) # Solve Dyson equation to get interacting dipole δρ = linsolve(dielectric_operator, δρ_nointeract, verbosity=3) println("Non-interacting polarizability:$(dipole(basis, δρ_nointeract))")
println("Interacting polarizability:     \$(dipole(basis, δρ))")
WARNING: using KrylovKit.basis in module ex-polarizability conflicts with an existing identifier.
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 1: normres = 2.492276907953e-01
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 2: normres = 3.786110714895e-03
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 3: normres = 3.419140780575e-04
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 4: normres = 5.016024219753e-06
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 5: normres = 3.499318594905e-07
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 6: normres = 1.870211833095e-09
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 7: normres = 1.865683423978e-11
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; step 8: normres = 1.934451882425e-12
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 1; finished at step 8: normres = 1.934451882425e-12
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; step 1: normres = 9.431412790990e-07
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; step 2: normres = 1.117832491984e-07
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; step 3: normres = 1.880113558654e-09
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; step 4: normres = 2.425714805218e-11
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; step 5: normres = 1.228753822435e-12
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 2; finished at step 5: normres = 1.228753822435e-12
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 3; step 1: normres = 3.103198215463e-11
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 3; step 2: normres = 2.457659380326e-12
[ Info: GMRES linsolve in iter 3; finished at step 2: normres = 2.457659380326e-12
┌ Info: GMRES linsolve converged at iteration 3, step 2:
│ *  norm of residual = 2.453534484501943e-12
└ *  number of operations = 17
Non-interacting polarizability: 1.9269041554030097
Interacting polarizability:     1.7744645564077333

As expected, the interacting polarizability matches the finite difference result. The non-interacting polarizability is higher.